I've been impressed with Gov. Mark Dayton's thoughtful process in dealing with most issues. However, I take issue with his recent decision to sign the bill that limits clawbacks from charities that receive donations from frauds like Tom Petters ("Nonprofits get break on clawbacks," April 4). Had the Dayton fortune been invested with Petters, would the governor have signed this bill?
DON HABERMAN, ORONO
Most Read
-
Readers Write: Presidential debates, campus protests, reading
-
Readers Write: The nature of war, smoking in Minneapolis, pollution, presidential immunity
-
Readers Write: Presidential immunity, Sen. Nicole Mitchell
-
Readers Write: Israel/Hamas war protests
-
Readers Write: Caucus system, state Sen. Nicole Mitchell, voting for RFK Jr.